How this momentum calculator works
The first mode is p = mv, solved in any direction. The second is the one that earns the page its keep: given a collision, it works out the force from how long the impact lasted, and shows what the same collision would have done over other durations. The third handles two objects hitting each other, reporting both the perfectly sticky and the perfectly bouncy outcomes and how much energy vanishes in between.
The formula
J = FΔt = Δp
sticking together: v = (m1u1 + m2u2) ÷ (m1 + m2)
elastic: v1 = ((m1 − m2)u1 + 2m2u2) ÷ (m1 + m2)
p is momentum in kilogram metres per second, a unit with no special name. J is impulse, which is both the force multiplied by the time it acts and the change in momentum it produces; those are the same thing viewed from two ends. Velocities carry a sign throughout, which is what lets the arithmetic tell a head-on collision from a rear-end one.
Worked example
A 70 kg person in a car at 30 mph. That is 13.41 m/s, so they carry 938.8 kg m/s of momentum. In a crash, all of it has to go somewhere, and the only question is how long it takes.
Stop them in 100 milliseconds, which is roughly what a modern car with a crumple zone and an airbag achieves, and the force is 9,388 N, about 13.7 g. Stop them in 20 milliseconds, which is closer to hitting a rigid barrier in an old car with no crumple zone, and the same person, the same speed and the same momentum produce 46,940 N, about 68 g. Survivable becomes not survivable, and nothing changed except the duration.
That is the entire principle behind every safety device ever built. The momentum change is fixed by the crash. The time is the only variable anyone can engineer, and force falls in exact proportion to it. Crumple zones, airbags, helmet liners, climbing rope stretch, gym mats, bending your knees when you land: every one of them is buying milliseconds.
Why momentum and energy are both needed
They look like they measure the same thing and they do not, and the difference decides real outcomes. Momentum is a vector, so it carries direction and can cancel. Kinetic energy is a scalar that depends on the square of speed, so it is never negative and never cancels.
Put two identical cars head on at the same speed and the total momentum is exactly zero. They stop dead. And yet all of their kinetic energy, which for two 1,500 kg cars at 20 m/s is 600 kJ, still has to go somewhere, and it goes into folding metal. The quantity that cancelled is not the quantity that hurt anyone. Run that case in the collision mode above and both numbers appear side by side.
The division of labour is worth remembering: momentum is always conserved in a collision, whatever happens, which makes it the reliable bookkeeping for working out where things end up. Kinetic energy is only conserved in the idealised elastic case, and the amount that goes missing is the amount that did damage. If you want to know where the pieces go, use momentum. If you want to know how bad it was, use energy.
The one number engineers can actually change
Look again at what is fixed and what is not in a crash. The mass is fixed. The speed is fixed by the moment of impact. So the change in momentum is fixed before anyone gets to design anything. The only free variable in J = FΔt is the duration, and the force follows from it by simple division.
This is why crash safety is a story about distance and time rather than about strength. A stiffer car is not a safer car; a stiffer car stops faster and hits its occupants harder. What a crumple zone does is deliberately fail, over as many centimetres and milliseconds as the packaging allows, so the deceleration is spread instead of concentrated. The same logic explains why a boxer rolls with a punch, why a fielder pulls their hands back as they catch, and why falling onto a mattress and onto concrete deliver identical momentum changes with entirely different consequences.
There is a limit to how far the trick goes, and it is geometric rather than clever. Stretching the stop needs room to stretch it in, and a car only has so much length in front of the passenger compartment. Beyond that, the remaining options are reducing the speed, which is our kinetic energy calculator's territory, and spreading the same force over more of the body, which is what a seatbelt does that a steering wheel does not.